Sunday, August 25, 2013

A Reflection on the Future of Distance Learning


A Reflective Paper on the Future of Distance Learning

 

Distance learning has become a "hot topic" in the field of education and corporate training. There is no doubt with the advancement of technology; distance learning will be making a lasting imprint on training and education for years to come.  Simonson et al. reports "many educators are making claims about how distance education is likely to change education and training".  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 4).  As new instructional designers, we need to begin conversations now on where distance education will be some five to twenty years from now, how we can improve the perception of distance learning, and what our role will be in the continuous improvement in the field. 

 

Distance education has already made a lasting impression in the field of education.  Gambescia and Paolucci said "college-level online courses have out-distanced all other forms of distance learning, in a remarkably short amount of time".  (Gambescia, et al., 2009)   The current climate of distance education indicates a positive upswing in growth.  Siemens said once we “bridge the gap of comfort” with technology, we will naturally accept distance education.  (Laureate Education, 2009)  Siemens goes on to say with “contributions from experts around the world, increased use of multimedia, games, and simulations, and growing trends supporting the Triple Helix model, online learning [is] becoming a preferable medium of learning”.  (Laureate Education, 2009)

 

We can improve the perception of distance learning by actively encouraging institutions to equitably promote their online programs.  Currently, there is a lack of high visibility of university online degree program offerings”.  (Gambescia, et al., 2009)  We can also seek ways to continue to improve communication between students and instructors.  Holmberg’s Theory of Interaction and Communication is evident that communication is vital to online learning.  (Simonson, 2012)  It was also apparent in our mini-surveys communication and interaction was very important to the learners.

 

Our role as instructional designers to be positive re-enforcement in the field of distance education begins with applying sound theory in our instructional design.  Simonson et al. writes “According to Keegan, a firmly based theory of distance education will be one that can provide the touchstone against which decisions – political, financial, educational, social – when they have to be made can be made with confidence.”  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 42)  We also need to use the appropriate tools in technology that help meet the learning objectives.  Finally, we must seek opportunities to assure the instructors of our products are adequately equipped and trained to deliver a quality online experience.

 

I am convinced distance learning is here to stay.  What we have already experienced with online learning can only get better five to twenty years from now.  The tables have already begun to turn with the perception of distance learning.  Siemens said “distance education is growing in acceptance in society as a whole”.  (Laureate Education, 2009)  He attributes this to more people “having experiences communicating online”.  (Laureate Education, 2009)  There is also no doubt instructional designers will play an active role in continuous improvement in distant learning.


References


Gambescia, S. &. (2009). Academic Fidelity and Integrity as Attributes of University Online Degree Program Offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume XII, Number 1.

Laureate Education, I. (2009). The Future of Distance Learning.

Simonson, M. S. (2012). Teaaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Boston: Pearson Education.

 

Thursday, August 22, 2013

From Face-to-Face to Online


From Face-to-Face to Online

Distance learning has had a dramatic impact on the way organizations teach, train, and learn.  It is no longer necessary for individuals to complete a training session or college course confined to a traditional classroom setting.  Different practices of online teaching have provided opportunities for corporations and universities to offer quality training to people who may otherwise be limited to their services.  Research has shown “distance learning can be as effective as traditional instruction when the technologies are appropriate for the instructional task, instructors provide timely feedback to students, and levels of student interactivity are high”.  (Durrington, et al., 2006)  However, in order to provide an equivalent classroom experience online, these providers must make a successful transition from face-to-face training to online instruction.  “Designing your blended course involves much more than ‘converting’ the content of an existing online or face-to-face course.”  (Designing a Blended Course, 2013)  This shift in instructions requires careful consideration and preparation.   Before making the changes to online instruction, there are some best practice guidelines any instructor may consider to make the transition a smooth and successful one.  Below is my list of popular best practices that can be used to narrow the time necessary to make the change from face-to-face to online instruction. 


References


Designing a Blended Course. (2013). Retrieved Aug 2013, from University of Illinois Springfield: http://www.uis.edu/colrs/learning/pedagogy/blendeddesign/

Durrington, V. B. (2006, Mar 18). Strategies for Enhancing Student Interactivity in an Online Environment. Retrieved Aug 20013, from redOrbit Your Universe Online: http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/433631/strategies_for_enhancing_student_interactivity

Sunday, August 4, 2013


The Impact of Open Source Courses

Open source courses are taking over the distance learning environments like a flood.  Businesses and universities alike are finding the advantages of using open source software to be not only easy to use but economically sound.  According to Simonson et al., “open source software is intended to be freely shared and can be improved upon and redistributed to others”.  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 141)  Davis states “the user avoids the expense of licensing and permits adaptation” as a key advantage of open source.  (Davis, 2010)  However, when it comes to the design of an online environment, how well does the open source site work?

School of Everything

School of Everything is an open source site developed by a group of individuals who thought “the way the current education system is organised is a bit rubbish, rigid and out of date”.   (School of Everything, n.d.)  They set out to design an online educational system inspired by the concept of Free U in California.  What was initially a free-for-all list of courses, instructors willing to teach, and students willing to learn, became “a 21st century new-fangled website thingy so you can design your own education however you please”.  (School of Everything, n.d.)   

What initially began literally as a collection of topics, seem to have taken shape in the form of modules.  The only critical parts of the planning process I noticed were the materials and the environment.  There were only links to resources and the environment was easy to navigate.  I did not see any engaging activities for the students or an evaluation piece to assess objectives.      

This site is especially designed for the adult learner.  There is the assumption “adults are more interested in participating in a distance learning situation because of their motivation to apply learning to their work”.  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 221)  The site is designed to select only those topics you are specifically interested in. I think it follows the Wedemeyer’s Theory of Independent Study.  Wedemeyer believed “outdated concepts of learning and teaching were being employed, and that they failed to utilize modern technologies”.  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 43)  Some may even say Moore’s Theory of Independent Study and Transactional Distance is evident in this site.  Moore believed “the amount of learner autonomy and the distance between teacher and learner” shaped the adult learning experience.  (Simonson, et al., 2012, pg. 44) However, high achieving, self-motivated P12 students could benefit from from this site.  

While this site was quite resourceful, careful consideration toward engaging the distance learner and evaluating learning outcomes could add value to the purpose this site.


 


References


Davis, P. (2010, Oct. 10). The Impact of Open Source. Retrieved Aug 2, 2013, from Patricia Davis' Blog: http://davispa.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/the-impact-of-open-source/

School of Everything. (n.d.). Retrieved Aug 2, 2013, from School of Everything Ltd.: http://schoolofeverything.com/about

Simonson, M. S. (2012). Teaaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Boston: Pearson Education.